Micron Document

EPSTEIN
page 3 / 907 . OCR, unverified


because a

Paragraph thr Is

MR. E

VERDELL:

THE C

OURT:

MR. E

VERDELL:

The defendant also worked with

objection.

23.

thr
that a continuing objection,

Paragraph three,

objections

see as your

Epstein to

Mr.

tting my submissions.

identified and

first

I do credit

fter seeing her in the Mar-a-Lago parking

identify and

to this

Everdell?

apologize.

Yes,

THE C

OURT:

regarding

is

tha

saved under the user name

reas

that the de

t the compu

the essay in

onabl

overrul

th

your Honor.

infer

ne

The second objection is

transferred Ms

conspiracy.

. Maxwe

1]

approximat

the conclusion that

the paragraph.

fendant authored the essay.

objection.

Ms.

your Honor?

The first

Maxwell was

"Ghislaine."

overrul

th

Metadata indicat

ter was registered to "GMax" and the documen

the

objection

supported by the trial evidence

ted

C was

to the assertion that

overru

e that objection.

SOUTHERN D

STR

GI

PORT

(212)

805-0300

BRS, PseG.

Bank statements

Epstein

tely $23 million during the

DOJ-OGR-00014754


==================== END OF root__DOJ-OGR-00014754.jpg.txt ====================


==================== DOCUMENT: root__DOJ-OGR-00014755.jpg.txt ====================

METADATA_SOURCE: .
METADATA_FILENAME: DOJ-OGR-00014755.jpg
----------------------------------------






~]



a

=



=
Hs


a

a
~]

a

a
Ke)







Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE

M6SQmaxl

admitted at trial showed that accounts under

wired approximately $23 million over two occasions during the

Document 779

conspiracy to accounts of

assertion t

control ove

inference t
bearing her

As
the record

townhouse,

hat

r these accounts does not undermin

hat the de

name,

to the

that Eps

testimony that the det

So

"Ghislaine Maxwell."

fendant controlled the

Filed 08/22/22

The det

Page 8 of 101

Epstein's name

Epstein's accountant may have had access to and

th

reasonable

funds in accounts

tein bought the det
overrule that objection because

Fendant told her that

defendant her New York townhouse.

Paragraph 25

being operated through a culture of

fendant her New Yor

that is established by a preponderanc

third objection that there's no evidence in

credit Kate's

Epstein bought the

is an objection to the characterization

you're not maintaining an

I think that the def

fault is we

of the Palm Beach residenc
silence.

You'll let me know if
objection.

MR. EVERDELL: Yes.
are, your Honor.

THE COURT: Understood.

overrule this objection.

indicates that this was the case.

manual instructed employees to "see nothing,

nothing."

credit Mr.

Alessi's testimony that he understood

this

instruction to be a kind of

For example,

hear

SOUTH

E RN

STR

GI

(PORTERS, P.C.*

(21

2)

805-0300

Evidence at trial

the household

nothing,

warning that he was supposed

k City

Fendant's

say

DOJ-OGR-00014755


==================== END OF root__DOJ-OGR-00014755.jpg.txt ====================


==================== DOCUMENT: root__DOJ-OGR-00014756.jpg.txt ====================

METADATA_SOURCE: .
METADATA_FILENAME: DOJ-OGR-00014756.jpg
----------------------------------------

NO





~]


Ke)

a

he

No

(ee)

=
Hs


_

a
~]

a

a
Ke}







Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE

M6SQmaxl

to be blind, deaf

Ms.

characterization concerning the de

Paragraph 26,

Document

and dumb,

Maxwell's lives.

isolation of

evidence.

overrule this objection

#79

fendant's

Filed 08/22/22

and to say nothing of

Page 9 of 101 9

Epstein's and

identi

there's an objection to the

fication and

articulated with respect to paragraph 22.

trial evidence established

isolated girls by spending

families.

Palm

New Mexico.

Beach residence alone

objections:

Epstein developed a

For example,

Paragraphs

th

fF minor girls as inconsistent with the

In addi
at the defendant and

time with them alone away

trial

for the same reasons as

tion, the

Epstein

from their

Annie's testimony regarding the trip to

Jane's testimony that she would spend time at the

wi

and 28

First, to the as

scheme

girls who recruited

each othe

that created a

th Epstein and the defendant.
the defendant makes two
sertion that the defendant and

r." And,

second,

"constant stream of

she objects to

the assertion that she encouraged minor girls to bring other

minor girls to provide

overrul

Again,

th

based on the

It s

paragraphs.

de

Carolyn in addition to at

turn recruited at least

objection.

The evidence indicated th

fendant's recruitment of Vi

lea

three

brought more girls.

trial testimony and evidence,

upported the

in

formation

Epstein with sexualized massages.

in these

schem

rginia.

st

friends,

SOUTHERN D

STR

GI

PORT

ERS,

(212

) 805-0300

2)

Virginia then enlis
two other girls.

and those

started with the

ted

Carolyn in

friends then

DOJ-OGR-00014756


==================== END OF root__DOJ-OGR-00014756.jpg.txt ====================


==================== DOCUMENT: root__DOJ-OGR-00014757.jpg.txt ====================